...and no, it isn't Word from Wormingford this time.
This week's centre page spread is taken from a new book A history of the Mothers Union: Women, Anglicanism and globalisation 1876-2008 by Dr. Cordelia Moyse. (Its about £50 from Amazon so I will be venturing no further - even if the article encouraged me to). I am not really quite sure how to clarify my thinking about this. For example, Dr Moyse has no compunction about stating that
the Clergy often feel no shame in articulating hostility to the MU
although no evidence is quoted, but so that I am not seen to be articulating hostility let me say that I think there are some good things in the MU; the work in the Third World is excellent (we locally support work in some quite poor places through an MU personal link) and our local branch does a good job of bringing some people who would otherwise be on their own together for lunches.
There are several other points that cause me concern too. Dr. Moyse credits the MU for having 'contributed to the notion that what makes an Anglican is being a communicant at a local Church'. Sadly, I think this is nothing to be proud of, and seems rather at odds with her claim that the MU is devalued because the Church focuses so much on its Clergy. Membership (whatever that means) is based on being baptised into the whole Church. The simplistic fixation upon the continued receiving of bread and wine alone has done the Church of England more harm than good because it has devalued laity as people who can lead full, complete and satisfying acts of worship themselves and it has also created a culture of dependency upon a fixed pattern of worship without any need for the person receiving something we regard as a token of God's Grace to grow and display any of that Grace at work in themselves. Yes, Communion is very important, but it is meant to be the engine room of change and growth in the people. Surely even my colleagues with a much higher theology of what happens at the Altar Rail would be unhappy with such a description.
MU members are praised by Moyse for their involvement in things such as Church Fetes and so on, which is true as far as it goes, but I understand the MU restricts their members involvement in fund raising to things which support only MU projects.
I would love the MU in this country to engage fully and clearly in Mission (as part of the wider Church), and I would be interested to hear ways in which this is happening (lunches for people who would be alone is one good example). As Moyse describes until fairly recently the MU was seen as a rather moral reactionary organisation with its opposition to divorce, and even so I find some of the MU prayer material difficult to use because it portrays a rose-tinted view of marriage and relationships. (Having said that I think their material for bereaved children is excellent).
Perhaps some of my Clergy colleagues could chip in with their opinions and experience on this, or perhaps MU members might want to clarify some of this.


Recent Comments